0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¿ä¾ç½Ã¼³°ú Àç°¡ÀÇ ¿ä¾çº¸È£»ç Á÷¹«ºñ±³

Comparison of Frequency and Difficulty of Care Helper Jobs in Long Term Care Facilities and Client Homes

Çѱ¹º¸°Ç°£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2012³â 26±Ç 1È£ p.101 ~ 110
KMID : 0379720120260010101
ȲÀºÈñ ( Hwang Eun-Hee ) - ¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú

Á¤´öÀ¯ ( Jung Duk-Yoo ) - ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ °£È£ÇкÎ
±è¹ÌÁ¤ ( Kim Mi-Jung ) - ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú
±è°ÇÈñ ( Kim Kon-Hee ) - ºÎ»ê°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú
½Å¼öÁø ( Shin Su-Jin ) - ¼øõÇâ´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú

Abstract

Purpose: The purposes of this study were to identify differences of duties, tasks, and task elements of care helpers between long term care (LTC) facilities and client¡¯s home (CH), and to provide data for the development of educational programs and policies.

Methods: This study was a descriptive investigation; the subjects of the study were 418 care helpers. Duties, tasks, and task elements were measured using the framework proposed by Shin et al. (2012). Data were analyzed by t-test using PASW 18.0.

Results: All of the jobs were statistically significant differences between LTC and CH. Dietary assistance and Daily work assistance were more frequently in CH, and the frequency of other tasks was higher in LTC than CH. Tasks with higher-reported difficulty by those who worked in LTC were as follows: personal hygiene, position change and movement, exercise and activity assistance, safety care, communication assistance, dietary assistance, environment management, daily work assistance, emergency prevention, early detection and speedy reporting, and dementia patient care.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that training for care helpers of each facility type will be differentiated. Tasks and task elements reported by care helpers were modified and added to the standard textbook.
KeyWords
³ëÀÎ, Àå±â¿ä¾ç, ¿ä¾ç½Ã¼³
Long term care, Care, Job analysis
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)